Introduction

The Indo-Pak War of 1971 stands as one of the most glorious chapters in Indian military history. It was a war that not only brought decisive military success to India but also reshaped the global map with the creation of a new nation, Bangladesh. The defining moment of this war—when Pakistan’s Lieutenant General A.A.K. Niazi surrendered to India’s Eastern Command Commander Lieutenant General Jagjit Singh Aurora—is immortalized in a historic painting. This iconic artwork, symbolizing the epitome of Indian military prowess and honor, was recently removed from its place in the Chief of Army Staff’s lounge at Army Headquarters and relocated to the Manekshaw Centre in Delhi Cantonment. This decision, insensitive at its core, has deeply hurt the sentiments of former soldiers and veterans who see it as a blow to the legacy of their unparalleled sacrifice.

A Living Symbol of History

This painting is not just a piece of art but a living testament to India’s military strength, discipline, and strategic brilliance. The surrender ceremony held in Dhaka on December 16, 1971, marked a monumental achievement for the Indian Armed Forces. It was the moment when the Indian Army played a decisive role in the creation of a new nation while upholding the highest standards of humanitarian values in war.

For 52 years, this painting adorned the lounge of the Army Headquarters, a space where dignitaries, both national and international, were welcomed. Its presence served as a constant reminder of the valour, professionalism, and achievements of the Indian Army. The image did not merely decorate the space; it dominated the atmosphere, offering an enduring narrative of India’s glorious military past.

The Flawed Logic of Army Headquarters

The Army Headquarters has argued that the painting has been moved to its “appropriate place” at the Manekshaw Centre. This reasoning is not only unconvincing but also absurd. The painting was much more than a decorative artifact in the Chief of Army Staff’s lounge; it was a source of inspiration and pride, reflecting the exceptional accomplishments of the Indian Armed Forces to every visitor. Relocating it to the Manekshaw Centre diminishes its historical and cultural significance, relegating a symbol of timeless pride to relative obscurity.

Pain and Discontent Among Veterans

This decision has caused immense anguish among the veterans of the 1971 war. This is the generation that risked everything on the battlefield to bring unparalleled glory to the nation. Removing this painting from its prominent place feels like disregarding their sacrifices and contributions. It is an act that runs contrary to the traditions and values of the Indian Army, which have always honored its heroes and their legacy.

The Alarming Trend of Politicization

One of the most concerning aspects of this decision is the growing politicization of the Indian Armed Forces. There is an unsettling trend of excessive triumphalism and politically motivated interference, particularly influenced by a ‘Hindutva Triumphalism’ ideology, which is tarnishing the secular and professional image of the Indian Army. For decades, the Indian Army has remained a neutral and apolitical institution, upholding its traditions of discipline and integrity. This recent decision, however, reflects a deviation from these principles, which is both unfortunate and dangerous.

Tampering with Army Traditions

The strength of the Indian Army lies in its discipline, secular ethos, and professional conduct. Honoring and preserving history is as critical for a military institution as preparing for the challenges of the present and future. By removing this historic painting from Army Headquarters, the leadership has, in effect, tampered with the traditions that form the bedrock of the Army’s ethos. Such actions are unacceptable for any professional and well-organized military force.

Conclusion

The victory of 1971 is not just a source of pride but also an enduring inspiration for the Indian Armed Forces. The removal of the iconic painting from Army Headquarters is not merely an administrative decision; it is an affront to the honor of our veterans and a violation of the traditions that define the Indian Army. The current leadership must reconsider this insensitive decision and restore this timeless symbol to its rightful place.

Furthermore, there is an urgent need to stem the politicization of the Armed Forces and preserve its professional and secular image. Respecting history and traditions must remain a priority to ensure that future generations draw inspiration from the glorious past of the Indian Army.

Jai Hind.
Respectfully,
Brigadier Sarvesh Dutt (Pahadi) Dangwal